Posted 01 April 2012 - 12:24 PM
>
But it's simply not in the same procedural state. One (the one with a white victim) is being treated as a crime. The other one (where the black victim is dead) is not. That is a huge difference
<
true, it is not the same, but not just treating;
one was a confrontation of misadventure in which the authorities still do not know exactly what happened, and the other was a crime: if they can prove that the fuel thing was done, regardless who did it, they prove a crime committed
in the case of Florida, what was that, Sanford? there was a confrontation and we all just convince ourselves what happened without really knowing, so no crime is yet proved
I am convinced that... and I'll put that in the other thread; the kid doused with fuel is in this thread ,
and I believe a crime was committed and there can be punishment
treating comes from what you follow with the evidence and known and unknown, though some will argue that treating is just by bias- but in this case, multiple teens accosted a single one, and lit doused fuel, cowardly, cruel, evil, and so there is this
treating about it
"(Do you read what they say online?) I check out all these scandalous rumours about me and Elijah Wood having beautiful sex with each other ... (are they true?) About Elijah and me being boyfriend and boyfriend? Absolutely true. We've been together for about nine years. I wooed him. No I just like a lot of stuff - I like that someone says one thing and it becomes fact. It's kind of fun." --Dominic Monaghan in a phone interview with Newsweek while buying DVDs at the store. :D