I am not a mod but your 'boy' comment added to the situation and not only complicated it but made it worse. Not one bootable situation but two.
Honestly LoP can not be blamed for not correctly stating correctly the original cause for your boot because you gave staff one reason then added to it. YOU complicated the situation. In the exact same thread. LoP is only human....not a king or God. It has been stated what your original boot was for. LoP not writing the right one with the abundance of riches you gave him....well, that doesn't change the original reason, only points out that if possible that would have definitely got the boot. Or worse.
The original post LotS was booted for and the only one he was booted for--
"I won't change who I am" is something I would see as a signal that you aren't going to cooperate with anyone. How can anyone see that as anything else but refusal to cooperate? Now if you had said "I am who I am but okay I will avoid that sort of comment in the future", that shows some inkling of cooperation.
So yes, bootable.
In the old days that would have got you a warning. A boot is nothing compared to that and you know it. Basically a timeout from one little thread. Not a warning and not a ban. Just a timeout, essentially an enforced timeout.
And staff has always had up to 5 days to do something about any posts. I wish it was sooner but that is the way it has always been.
Btw at one time not so long ago, only pm appeals were allowed to avoid the endless pile-ons so allowing appeals by IC thread only by the one booted is at least making those more visible to them membership now. But I am sure that staff won't mind if anyone does it the old way either and sends a pm.
Now I am booting myself from this thread. And if the mods choose to boot me for this post then so be it. I can take it.
I'm not going to rehash this thing yet again. But it was longer then 5 days, I think it was like 10 days. And the thread had already calmed down on its own, til staff stirred it all back up again.