I don't mind at all.
I'm not advocating "Mob rule" no. What I'm merely saying is that if the Majority (90%) don't want something put up in their town, it shouldn't be. If one of the minority, like this Bigot, insists that the Courts allow him to place a monument that the Majority clearly doesn't want, then the Majority should remove it.
Because, otherwise we have a "Tyranny of the Minority". If the majority of the town doesn't want it, why should they have to be forced to have it? Surely you're not advocating a "Tyranny of the Minority"?
As for other religious views being displayed...I'm all for it. I'm not a Muslim, don't believe in their views, but I'd have no problem having a Muslim monument being erected. And, here's where it gets tricky though. If it was a Muslim preacher wanting to put a statue of Allah up, and the Majority of the town didn't want it, I'd say that, in that case, the Majority was wrong. If one religious view is up, then others should be allowed as well. However, what this Bigot is trying to put up has nothing whatsoever to do with religion...it's hate and evil pure and simple.
About the only exception I can see here would be if someone wanted to erect a Satanic altar...
As for destroying the 10 commandments monument...Even if you disagree with them, they don't preach Hate and Evil. What this Bigot want to erect would be a monument to HATE...pure and simple.